Choosing a Low Carb or High Protein Diet Plan

Choosing a weight-loss program may be a difficult task. You may not know what to look for in a weight-loss program or what questions to ask. This fact sheet can help you talk to your health care professional about weight loss and get the best information before choosing a program.

 

Talk With Your Health Care Professional

 

If your health care provider tells you that you should lose weight and you want to find a weight-loss program to help you, look for one that is based on regular physical activity and an eating plan that is balanced, healthy, and easy to follow.

 

You may want to talk with your doctor or other health care professional about controlling your weight before you decide on a weight-loss program. Doctors do not always address issues such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management during general office visits. It is important for you to start the discussion in order to get the information you need. Even if you feel uncomfortable talking about your weight with your doctor, remember that he or she is there to help you improve your health. Here are some tips:

 

    * Tell your health care professional that you would like to talk about your weight. Share your concerns about any medical conditions you have or medicines you are taking.

    * Write down your questions in advance.

    * Bring pen and paper to take notes.

    * Bring a friend or family member along for support if this will make you feel more comfortable.

    * Make sure you understand what your health care provider is saying. Do not be afraid to ask questions if there is something you do not understand.

    * Ask for other sources of information like brochures or websites.

    * If you want more support, ask for a referral to a registered dietitian, a support group, or a commercial weight-loss program.

    * Call your health care professional after your visit if you have more questions or need help.

 

 

Ask Questions           

 

Find out as much as you can about your health needs before joining a weight-loss program. Here are some questions you might want to ask your health care professional:

 

About Your Weight

 

    * Do I need to lose weight?  Or should I just avoid gaining more?

    * Is my weight affecting my health?

    * Could my extra weight be caused by a health problem such as hypothyroidism or by a medicine I am taking?  (Hypothyroidism is when your thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone, a condition that can slow your metabolism—how your body creates and uses energy.)

 

About Weight Loss

 

    * What should my weight-loss goal be?

    * How will losing weight help me?

 

About Nutrition and Physical Activity

 

    * How should I change my eating habits?

    * What kinds of physical activity can I do?

    * How much physical activity do I need?

 

About Treatment

 

    * Should I take weight-loss drugs?

    * What about weight-loss surgery?

    * What are the risks of weight-loss drugs or surgery?

    * Could a weight-loss program help me?

 

 

A Responsible and Safe Weight-loss Program       

 

If your health care provider tells you that you should lose weight and you want to find a weight-loss program to help you, look for one that is based on regular physical activity and an eating plan that is balanced, healthy, and easy to follow. Weight-loss programs should encourage healthy behaviors that help you lose weight and that you can stick with every day. Safe and effective weight-loss programs should include:

 

    * Healthy eating plans that reduce calories but do not forbid specific foods or food groups.

    * Tips to increase moderate-intensity physical activity.

    * Tips on healthy habits that also keep your cultural needs in mind, such as lower-fat versions of your favorite foods.

    * Slow and steady weight loss. Depending on your starting weight, experts recommend losing weight at a rate of 1/2 to 2 pounds per week. Weight loss may be faster at the start of a program.

    * Medical care if you are planning to lose weight by following a special formula diet, such as a very low-calorie diet (a program that requires careful monitoring from a doctor).

    * A plan to keep the weight off after you have lost it.

 

 

Get Familiar with the Program         

 

Gather as much information as you can before deciding to join a program. Professionals working for weight-loss programs should be able to answer the questions listed below.

 

What does the weight-loss program consist of?

 

    * Does the program offer one-on-one counseling or group classes?

    * Do you have to follow a specific meal plan or keep food records?

    * Do you have to purchase special food, drugs, or supplements?

    * If the program requires special foods, can you make changes based on your likes and dislikes and food allergies?

    * Does the program help you be more physically active, follow a specific physical activity plan, or provide exercise instruction?

    * Does the program teach you to make positive and healthy behavior changes?

    * Is the program sensitive to your lifestyle and cultural needs?

    * Does the program provide ways to keep the weight off? Will the program provide ways to deal with such issues as what to eat at social or holiday gatherings, changes to work schedules, lack of motivation, and injury or illness?

 

What are the staff qualifications?

 

    * Who supervises the program?

    * What type of weight management training, experience, education, and certifications does the staff have?

 

Does the product or program carry any risks?

 

    * Could the program hurt you?

    * Could the recommended drugs or supplements harm your health?

    * Do participants talk with a doctor?

    * Does a doctor run the program?

    * Will the program’s doctors work with your personal doctor if you have a medical condition such as high blood pressure or are taking prescribed drugs?

    * Is there ongoing input and follow-up from a health care professional to ensure your safety while you participate in the program?

 

How much does the program cost?

 

    * What is the total cost of the program?

    * Are there other costs, such as weekly attendance fees, food and supplement purchases, etc.?

    * Are there fees for a follow-up program after you lose weight?

    * Are there other fees for medical tests?

 

What results do participants typically have?

 

    * How much weight does an average participant lose and how long does he or she keep the weight off?

    * Does the program offer publications or materials that describe what results participants typically have?

Weight Loss and Meal Replacements

Improved Weight Loss and Long Term Health Benefits 

 

 The Arizona Diet Products program is based upon the use of convenient meal replacement shakes, bars, and puddings that are scientifically proven to provide superior short term and long-term weight loss. The convenient meal replacements make it easy to eat right and make the right choice consistently to ensure optimal success. Additionally the use of convenient meals, such as those provided by Arizona Diet Products, are associated with lower risk of certain types of disease markers. Together this means that the Arizona Diet Products program is an effective way to lose weight quickly and keep it off forever, along with increasing overall health in the long term. 

 

 Third Party Study: Value of structured meals for weight management: risk factors and long-term weight maintenance. 

 

 OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in biomarkers of disease risk after 51 months of reduced energy intake and sustained weight loss. 

 

 DESIGN: This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, two-arm, parallel intervention for 12 weeks followed by a prospective, single-arm, 4-year trial in a university-based hospital clinic. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to one of two dietary interventions for 3 months. Group A was prescribed an energy-restricted diet of 1200 to 1500 kcal/d, and group B was prescribed an isocaloric diet, whereby two of three meals were replaced with nutrient-fortified liquid meal replacements (such as Arizona Diet Products). After 3 months, the patients were prescribed the same caloric reduction and used once-daily replacements for the succeeding 4 years. Body weight and blood pressure were checked monthly. Biomarkers of disease risk were measured after 3, 9, 15, 27, and 51 months. 

 

 RESULTS: During the 3-month weight-loss period, body weight was reduced by 1.5 +/- 0.4% and 7.8 +/- 0.5% (mean +/- SEM) for groups A and B, respectively. After 4 years, 75% of the patients were evaluated. Total mean weight loss was 3.3 +/- 0.8% and 8.4 +/- 0.8% for groups A and B, respectively. Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and systolic blood pressure. Cholesterol concentrations were reduced in patients with high initial cholesterol levels and maintenance of a 7% weight loss. 

 

 DISCUSSION: Providing a structured meal plan with liquid meal replacements is an effective treatment for obese subjects. Long-term maintenance of weight loss with meal replacements improves biomarkers of disease risk. 

 

 Obesity Research Nov; 9 Supplement 4:284S-289S. 

Weight Loss Categories

Weight loss, in the context of medicine or health or physical fitness, is a reduction of the total body weight, due to a mean loss of fluid, body fat or adipose tissue and/or lean mass, namely bones mineral deposits, muscle, tendon and other connective tissue.

 

Unintentional weight loss

A significant loss of total body weight is a serious, chronic illness. Substantial, unintentional weight loss is a symptom of acute or chronic illness, especially if other evidence is present.

Weight loss, for example, accompanied by early satiety, bilious vomiting of partially undigested food, postprandial epigastric pain and eructation may indicate Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome. Weight loss accompanied by insatiable thirst and hunger and fatigue may indicate diabetes mellitus, a chronic disease characterized by an abnormal accumulation of carbohydrates in the bloodstream due to insufficient production of insulin, a hormone produced in the pancreas that, when secreted into the bloodstream, permits cellular metabolism and utilization of glucose.

Poor management of type 1 diabetes mellitus, also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), leads to an excessive amount of glucose and an insufficient amount of insulin in the bloodstream. This triggers the release of triglycerides from adipose (fat) tissue and catabolism (breakdown) of amino acids in muscle tissue. This results in a loss of both fat and lean mass, leading to a significant reduction in total body weight. Note that untreated type 1 diabetes mellitus will usually not produce weight loss, as these patients get acutely ill before they would have had time to lose weight.

Myriad of additional scientific considerations are applicable to weight loss, including but not limited to: physiological and exercise sciences, nutrition science, behavioral sciences, and other sciences.

One area involves the science of bioenergetics including biochemical and physiological energy production and utilization systems, that are frequently evidence of diabetes, and ketone bodies, acetone particles occurring in body fluids and tissues involved in acidosis, also known as ketosis, somewhat common in severe diabetes.

In addition to weight loss due to a reduction in fat and lean mass, illnesses such as diabetes, certain medications, lack of fluid intake and other factors can trigger fluid loss. And fluid loss in addition to a reduction in fat and lean mass exacerbates the risk for cachexia.

Infections such as HIV may alter metabolism, leading to weight loss.

Hormonal disruptions, such as an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism), may also exhibit as weight loss. Intentional weight loss

Weight loss may refer to the loss of total body mass in an effort to improve fitness, health, and/or appearance.

Therapeutic weight loss, in individuals who are overweight, can decrease the likelihood of developing diseases such as diabetes. Overweight and obese individuals face a greater risk of health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke, osteoarthritis and certain types of cancer. For healthy weight loss, a physician should be consulted to develop a weight loss plan that is tailored to the individual.

Weight loss occurs when an individual is in a state of negative energy balance. When the human body is spending more energy in work and heat than it is gaining from food or other nutritional supplements, it will catabolize stored reserves of fat or muscle.

Although weight loss may involve loss of fat, muscle or fluid, weight loss for the purposes of maintaining health should aim to lose fat while conserving muscle and fluid.

It is not uncommon for people who are already at a medically healthy weight to intentionally lose weight. In some cases it is with the goal of improving athletic performance or to meet weight classifications in a sport. In other cases, the goal is to attain a more attractively shaped body. Being underweight is associated with health risks. Health problems can include difficulty fighting off infection, osteoporosis, decreased muscle strength, trouble regulating body temperature and even increased risk of death.

 Therapeutic weight loss techniques

 

The least intrusive weight loss methods and those most often recommended by physicians, are adjustments to eating patterns and increased physical exercise. Usually, health professionals will recommend that their overweight patients combine a reduction of the caloric content of the diet with an increase in physical activity. In addition, a much proposed method to hold oneself to a decreased calorie-diet is to increase the amount of water you drink. This method has been proposed by nutritionists as BCM and other organizations involved in weight loss.

Other methods of losing weight include use of drugs and supplements that decrease appetite, block fat absorption, or reduce stomach volume. Surgery is another method. Bariatric surgery artificially reduces the size of the stomach, limiting the intake of food energy. Some of these treatments may have serious side-effects.

 

 “Crash Dieting”

A crash diet is where a person willfully restricts themselves of all nourishment (except water) for more than 12 hours. The desired result is to have the body burn fat for energy with the goal of losing a significant amount of weight in a short time. Crash dieting is not the same as flexible intermittent fasting, where dieters fast for 2 days each week and calories are cycled. Generally the weight lost in a crash diet returns when normal eating resumes.

 Weight loss industry

In the developed world, there is a substantial market for products which promise to make weight loss easier, quicker, cheaper, more reliable, or less painful. These include books, CDs, crèmes, lotions, pills, rings and earrings, body wraps, body belts and other materials, fitness centers, personal coaches, weight loss groups and food products and supplements. US residents in 1992 spent an estimated $30 billion a year on all types of diet programs and products, including diet foods and drinks.

Between $33 billion and $55 billion is spent annually on weight loss products and services, including medical procedures and pharmaceuticals, with weight loss centers garnering between six percent and 12 percent of total annual expenditure. About 70 percent of American’s dieting attempts are of a self-help nature. Although often short-lived, these diet fads are a positive trend for this sector as Americans ultimately turn to professionals to help them meet their weight loss goals.

 

Increased Weight Loss with Controlled Portions

Increased Weight Loss Results Compared to Conventional Diets 

 

 Arizona Diet Products suwr is based upon the use of great tasting and convenient meal replacements. Meal replacements are scientifically shown to increase weight loss results when compared to conventional diets. This is because meal replacements are convenient, take all the guesswork out of eating correctly, and make consistency in eating the right amounts easier day in and day out. With Arizona Diet Products  you have advanced nutritional products that make following the program easy. 

 

 Third Party Study: Weight Management Using Meal Replacements 

 

 OBJECTIVE: Although used by millions of overweight and obese consumers, there has not been a systematic assessment on the safety and effectiveness of a meal replacement strategy for weight management. The aim of this study was to review, by use of a meta- and pooling analysis, the existing literature on the safety and effectiveness of a meal replacement plan using one or two vitamin/mineral fortified meal replacements as well as regular foods for long-term weight management. 

 

 DESIGN: A plan was defined as a program that prescribes a low calorie diet whereby meals are replaced by commercially available, energy-reduced product(s) that are vitamin and mineral fortified, and includes at least one meal of regular foods. Randomized, controlled interventions of at least 3 months duration, with subjects 18 y of age or older and a BMI-Z 25 kg/m2, were evaluated. Studies with self-reported weight and height were excluded. Searches in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Clinical Trials identified 30 potential studies for analysis. Of these, six met all of the inclusion criteria and used liquid meal replacement products (such as Arizona Diet Products shakes) with the associated plan. Overweight and obese subjects were randomized to the meal replacement plan or a conventional reduced calorie diet (RCD) plan. The prescribed calorie intake was the same for both groups. Authors of the six publications were contacted and asked to supply primary data for analysis. Primary data from the six studies were used for both meta- and pooling analyses. 

 

 RESULTS: Subjects prescribed either plans lost significant amounts of weight at both the 3-month and 1-year evaluation time points. All methods of analysis indicated a significantly greater weight loss in subjects receiving the meal replacement plan compared to the RCD group. Depending on the analysis and follow-up duration, the meal replacement group lost 7–8% body weight and the RCD group lost 3–7% body weight. Risk factors of disease associated with excess weight improved with weight loss in both groups at the two time points. The degree of improvement was also dependent on baseline risk factor levels. The dropout rate for meal replacement group and RCD groups was equivalent at 3 months and significantly less in the meal replacement group at 1 year. 

 

 CONCLUSION: This first systematic evaluation of randomized controlled trials utilizing meal replacement plans, such as Arizona Diet Products , for weight management suggests that these types of interventions can safely and effectively produce significant sustainable weight loss and improve weight-related risk factors of disease. 

 

 International Journal of Obesity 27, 537–549.

 

Atkins Diet, History and Overview

Nature of the diet

 

The Atkins Diet represents a departure from prevailing theories. Atkins claimed there are two main unrecognized factors about Western eating habits, arguing firstly that the main cause of obesity is eating refined carbohydrates, particularly sugar, flour, and high-fructose corn syrups; and secondly, that saturated fat is overrated as a nutritional problem, and that only trans fats from sources such as hydrogenated oils need to be avoided. Consequently, Dr. Atkins rejected the advice of the food pyramid, instead asserting that the tremendous increase in refined carbohydrates is responsible for the rise in metabolic disorders of the 20th century, and that the focus on the detrimental effects of dietary fat has actually contributed to the obesity problem by increasing the proportion of insulin-inducing foods in the diet. While most of the emphasis in Atkins is on the diet, nutritional supplements and exercise are considered equally important elements.

 

Atkins involves the restriction of carbohydrates in order to switch the body’s metabolism from burning glucose to burning stored body fat. This process (called lipolysis) begins when the body enters the state of ketosis as a consequence of running out of excess carbohydrates to burn. Dr. Atkins in his book New Diet Revolution claimed that the low-carbohydrate diet produces a “metabolic advantage” where the body burns more calories, overall, than on normal diets, and also expels some unused calories. He cited one study where he estimated this advantage to be 950 calories (4.0 MJ) a day. However, a review study in the Lancet (see below) concluded that there was no metabolic advantage and dieters were simply eating fewer calories due to boredom. Professor Astru stating that “The monotony and simplicity of the diet could inhibit appetite and food intake.”, or possibly protein inducing a satiating effect.

 

The Atkins diet restricts “net carbs” (carbohydrates that have an effect on blood sugar). The effect is to decrease the onset of hunger from low blood sugar. Dr. Atkins says in Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution (2002) that hunger is the number one reason why low-fat diets fail. Though studies show the efficacy of the Atkins approach after one year is the same as a low-fat diet, Dr. Atkins claimed that it was easier to stay on the Atkins diet because dieters did not feel hungry or “deprived”. Other studies have sited that the ‘low fat’ trend which portrays the myth that fat in the food somehow transfers to fat in the body, do not mention the essential amino-acids which are essential in brain function and precursors to serotonin and other neurotransmitters. One study goes as far as comparing the low fat trend with the increase in diagnosed depression over the last two decades.

 

Net carbohydrates can be calculated from a food source by subtracting sugar alcohols and fiber (which are shown to have a negligible effect on blood sugar levels) from total carbohydrates. Sugar alcohols need to be treated with caution, because while they may be slower to convert to glucose, they can be a significant source of glycemic load and can stall weight loss. Fructose (e.g., as found in many industrial sweeteners) also contributes to caloric intake, though outside of the glucose-insulin control loop.

 

 

Preferred foods in all categories are whole, unprocessed foods with a low glycemic load. Atkins Nutritionals, the company responsible for marketing the Atkins Diet, recommends that no more than 20% of calories eaten while on the diet come from saturated fat.

 

According to his book Atkins Diabetes Revolution, for people whose blood sugar is abnormally high or who have type-2 diabetes, this diet decreases or eliminates the need for drugs to treat these conditions. The Atkins Blood Sugar Control Program (ABSCP) is an individualized approach to weight control and permanent management of the risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

 

 Phases

 

There are four phases of the Atkins diet: induction, ongoing weight loss, pre-maintenance and lifetime maintenance.

 

 Induction

 

The Induction phase is the first, and most restrictive, phase of the Atkins Nutritional Approach. It is intended to cause the body to quickly enter a state of ketosis. Carbohydrate intake is limited to 20 net grams per day (grams of carbohydrates minus grams of fiber, sugar alcohols, or glycerin), 12 to 15 net grams of which must come in the form of salad greens and other green vegetables (broccoli, green beans, spinach and asparagus). The allowed foods include a liberal amount of all meats, fish, shellfish, fowl, and eggs; up to 4 ounces (113 g) of soft or semi-soft cheese; salad vegetables; other low carbohydrate vegetables; and butter and vegetable oils. Drinking eight glasses of water per day is a must during this phase. Alcoholic beverages are not allowed during this phase. Caffeine is allowed in moderation so long as it does not cause cravings or low blood sugar. If a caffeine addiction is evident, it is best to not allow it until later phases of the diet. A daily multivitamin with minerals is also recommended.

 

The Induction Phase is usually when many see the most significant weight loss — reports of losses of 5 to 10 pounds per week are not uncommon when Induction is combined with daily exercise.

 

Atkins suggests the use of Ketostix, small chemically reactive strips used by diabetics. These let the dieter monitor when they enter the ketosis or fat burning, phase. Other indicators of ketosis include a metallic taste in the mouth, or bad breath.

 

 Ongoing weight loss

 

The Ongoing Weight Loss (OWL) phase of Atkins consists of an increase in carbohydrate intake, but remaining at levels where weight loss occurs. The target daily carbohydrate intake increases each week by 5 net grams. A goal in OWL is to find the “Critical Carbohydrate Level for Losing” and to learn in a controlled manner how food groups in increasing glycemic levels and foods within that group affect your craving control. The OWL phase lasts until weight is within 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of the target weight. During the first week, one should add more of the induction acceptable vegetables to his/her daily products. For example, 6-8 stalks of asparagus, salad, and one cup of cauliflower or one half of avocado. The next week, one should follow the carbohydrate ladder that Dr Atkins created for this phase and add fresh dairy. The ladder has 9 rungs and should be added in order given. One can skip a rung if one does not intend to include that food group in one’s permanent way of eating, such as the alcohol rung.

 

The rungs are as follows:

 

    * Induction acceptable vegetables

    * Fresh dairy

    * Nuts

    * Berries

    * Alcohol

    * Legumes

    * Other fruits

    * Starchy vegetables

    * Grains

 

 Pre-maintenance

 

Carbohydrate intake is increased again this time by 10 net carbs a week from the ladder groupings, and the key goal in this phase is to find the “Critical Carbohydrate Level for Maintenance”, this is the maximum number of carbohydrates you can eat each day without gaining weight. This may well be above the level of carbohydrates inducing ketosis on a testing stick. As a result, it is not necessary to maintain a positive ketosis test long term.

 

 Lifetime maintenance

 

This phase is intended to carry on the habits acquired in the previous phases, and avoid the common end-of-diet mindset that can return people to their previous habits and previous weight. Whole, unprocessed food choices are emphasized, with the option to drop back to an earlier phase if you begin to gain weight.

 

 Popularity

 

The Atkins Nutritional Approach gained widespread popularity in 2003 and 2004. At the height of its popularity one in eleven North-American adults were on the diet. This large following was blamed for large declines in the sales of carbohydrate-heavy foods like pasta and rice (sales were down 8.2 and 4.6 percent, respectively, in 2003). The diet’s success was even blamed for a decline in Krispy Kreme sales. Trying to capitalize on the “low-carb craze,” many companies released special product lines that were low in carbohydrates. Coca-Cola released C2 and Pepsi-Cola created Pepsi Edge, which was scheduled to be discontinued later in 2005. Unlike the sugar-free soft drinks Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, which had been available for decades, these new drinks used a blend of traditional sweetener and the diet drinks’ artificial sweeteners to offset the allegedly inferior artificial sweetener flavor. These “half-and-half” drinks declined in popularity as soft drink makers learned to use newer sweeteners to mask the flavor of aspartame (or completely replace it) in reformulated diet drinks such as Coca-Cola Zero and Pepsi ONE.

 

Robert Atkins died from a fatal head injury sustained in a fall on ice in 2003. The nutritional plan suffered from rumors and allegations that he was obese at the time and had died from a heart condition as a result. On July 31, 2005, the Atkins Nutritional company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after the percentage of adults on the diet declined to two percent and sales of Atkins brand product fell steeply in the second half of 2004.

 

The Low Carb Revolution was a one-hour documentary television special on the Atkins diet. The special, which aired on Food Network Canada, on April 25, 2004, described how this diet works, had success stories, and quickly presented some recipes.

 

 Scientific Studies

 

Several randomized, controlled studies of less than one year, published in peer-reviewed journals, have been conducted to gauge the effectiveness of the Atkins diet. There are no rigorous studies to show the results after 1 year.

 

According to a review of the scientific data published in the Lancet, there is no proof that the Atkins diet is effective beyond 6 months. The review led by Arne Astrup of the Centre of Advanced Food Research at Copenhagen’s RVA University, concluded that “There is no clear evidence that Atkins-style diets are better than any others for helping people to stay slim,[and] despite the popularity and apparent success of the Atkins diet, evidence in support of its use lags behind. Although the diet appears as claimed to promote weight loss without hunger at least in the short-term, the long-term effects on health and disease prevention are unknown.”

 

The researchers concluded it was unlikely that weight-loss come through ketosis because ‘urinary traces of ketones were so low that very little energy would be used up this way’. They concluded that a possible reason that participants lost weight was that the diet was so monotonous that they simply ate less; weight loss was a result of boredom. “Patients who want to try these diets should be told that, although safety cannot be guaranteed, they seem to be safe for short-term use (up to six months) as long as weight loss occurs,” the authors said.

 

When the Atkins diet was introduced in the 1970s, it was immediately attacked by existing experts, who claimed it was unhealthy and would fail. For example, Atkins testified before the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, in April, 1973. That day, “three authorities in nutrition and health … [testified] that Atkins’s severely carbohydrate-restricted diet was neither revolutionary, effective, nor safe,” and a comment by Harvard nutritionist Fred Stare was read into the record: “The Atkins diet is nonsense…. Any book that recommends unlimited amounts of meat, butter and eggs, as this does, in my opinion is dangerous. The author who makes the suggestion is guilty of malpractice.” Subsequent studies have not supported those fears for the short term, but the long term safety remains unknown.

 

    * “The low-carbohydrate diet produced a greater weight loss for the first six months, but the differences were not significant at one year. The low-carbohydrate diet was associated with a greater improvement in some risk factors for coronary heart disease. Adherence was poor and attrition was high in both groups. Longer and larger studies are required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and high-fat diets.” — New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 348, Pages 2082-2090, 22 May 2003, Number 21

    * A study comparing weight loss and metabolic changes in obese adults randomly assigned to either a low-carbohydrate diet or a conventional weight loss diet at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center concluded the following: “Participants on a low-carbohydrate diet had more favorable overall outcomes at 1 year than did those on a conventional diet. Weight loss was similar between groups, but effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia and glycemic control were still more favorable with a low-carbohydrate diet after adjustment for differences in weight loss.”

    * In a controlled study, published in JAMA (March 7, 2007), by Gardner at Stanford University, found ‘Weight loss was not statistically different among the Zone, LEARN, and Ornish groups’ but ‘was significantly different between the Atkins and Zone diets’. The study followed 311 premenopausal, nondiabetic women, age 25-50. The women lost more weight (mean 4.7 kg equating to 0.2lbs(90g)/week) on the Atkins diet than on 3 higher-carbohydrate diets (LEARN 2.6 kg, Ornish 2.2 kg, and Zone 1.6 kg), without increasing cardiovascular risks. The statistically significant findings for changes in HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure favored Atkins over the other three diets. The authors conclude: “Concerns about adverse metabolic effects of the Atkins diet were not substantiated within the 12-month study period.”

 

The strongest evidence is randomized, controlled studies published in peer-reviewed journals. The greater the number of subjects, and the longer the subjects are followed, the more powerful the study. To date, the longest studies are 1 year, so the effects of the diet over longer durations are not known.

 

The medical principles and scientific theory behind the Atkins diet were first put forward in a series of articles by Dr. Richard D. Feinman, a professor of biochemistry and medical researcher at State University of New York (SUNY) Health Science Center (Downstate) at Brooklyn. Feinman, president of the Nutrition & Metabolism Society, published work which attempts to prove the common idea that “a calorie is a calorie” is not correct. His research aims to demonstrate why the diet is nutritionally sound and to elucidate principles which prove Atkins scientifically correct.

 

Proponents of the Atkins diet feel much of the criticism leveled at the diet comes from statements and opinions of individuals and associations, rather than from controlled and reviewed studies. Advocates of the diet dispute criticisms, such as the fact that a low-carbohydrate diet is likely to be high-fat and allegations that fat, especially saturated fat, is harmful. Atkins backers maintain that, unlike trans fat, which can result from partial hydrogenation, fully saturated fat is not harmful. Proponents cite the award-winning science writer Gary Taubes who, in a 2001 article in Science, 291 (5513): 2536 claimed that the oft-cited “consensus” opinion against saturated fats derives from political rather than scientific motives. Taubes’ 2007 book Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease also makes this point, but in more depth. Taubes reviews the nutrition research of a century from various angles, and draws his conclusion from a very diverse set of evidence.

 

One study found that saturated fat may be cardio-protective in post menopausal women.

 

The May 22, 2003, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published two scientific, randomized studies comparing standard low-fat diets to low-carbohydrate diets such as the Atkins Diet. In both studies, subjects lost more weight on the low-carbohydrate plans at 6-months but not at 1-year. The editors noted that “Adherence was poor and attrition was high in both groups. Longer and larger studies are required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and high-fat diets.”

 

Duke University, funded by an unrestricted grant from the Atkins Foundation, (2005) found that both the low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets studied improved cardiac health indicators, but in different ways. The commonality between the diets studied is that both restricted refined sugar and junk food and both encouraged 30 minutes of exercise at least three times a week.

 

 Controversies

 

An analysis conducted by Forbes magazine found that the boxed retail Atkins Nutritional Approach food product is one of the top five in the expense category of ten plans Forbes analyzed. The analysis showed the median average of the ten diets was approximately 50% higher, and Atkins 80% higher, than the American national average. Atkins was less expensive than Jenny Craig and more expensive than Weight Watchers.

 

Low-carbohydrate diets have been the subject of heated debate in medical circles for three decades. They are still controversial and only recently has any serious research supported some aspects of Atkins’ claims, especially for short-term weight-loss (6 months or less).

 

But many in the scientific community also raise serious concerns:

 

    * Dr. Robert Eckel of the American Heart Association says that high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets put people at risk of heart disease; A long term study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2006 found that women reduced heart disease risk by eating more protein and fat from vegetable sources.

 

    * A 2001 scientific review conducted by Freedman et al. and published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Obesity Research concluded that low-carb dieters’ initial advantage in weight loss was a result of increased water loss, and that after the initial period, low-carbohydrate diets produce similar fat loss to other diets with similar caloric intake.

 

    * The May 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine study showed that “minor adverse effects” of diarrhea, general weakness, rashes and muscle cramps “were more frequent in the low-carbohydrate diet group”.

 

    * Consuming too much protein can create health problems and protein toxicity for patients with certain medical problems, for example those with preexisting kidney problems.

 

Opponents of the diet also point out that the initial weight loss upon starting the diet is a phenomenon common with most diets, and is due to reduction in stored glycogen and related water in muscles, not fat loss. They claim that no evidence has surfaced that any diet will cause weight loss unless it reduces food energy (calories) below the maintenance level and that weight loss from the Atkins diet may be the result of less food energy being consumed by the dieter, rather than the lack of carbohydrates. They further point out that weight loss on fad diets, which typically restrict or prohibit certain foods, is often because the dieter has fewer food choices available.

 

 Misconceptions about the diet

 

Many people incorrectly believe that the Atkins Diet promotes eating unlimited amounts of fatty meats and cheeses. This is a key point of clarification that Dr. Atkins addressed in the more recent revisions of his book. Although the Atkins Diet does not impose limits on certain foods, or caloric restriction in general, Dr. Atkins points out in his book that this plan is “not a license to gorge.” The director of research and education for Atkins Nutritionals, Collette Heimowitz, has said, “The media and opponents of Atkins often sensationalize and simplify the diet as the all-the-steak-you-can-eat diet. This has never been true.”

 

Another common misconception arises from confusion between the Induction Phase and rest of the diet. The first two weeks of the Atkins Diet are strict, with only 20g of carbohydrates permitted per day. Atkins states that a dieter can safely stay at the Induction Phase for several months if the person has a lot of weight to lose. Once the weight-loss goal is reached, carbohydrate levels are raised gradually, though still significantly below USDA norms, and still within or slightly above the definition of ketosis.

 

The Induction Phase is also known for its comparatively lower intake of dietary fiber, and this is often misconstrued as characteristic of the diet as a whole. In fact fiber supplements, such as psyllium seed husks, are recommended for the early stages. It is often misstated that those on the diet do not consume enough vegetables and fruits. However those who follow it properly should not face this problem as even the Induction Phase allows for adequate amounts of dark green leaf vegetables.

 

 

 

 

Low Carbohydrate Diets Examples and Practices

Practices and theories

 

The term low-carbohydrate diet today is most strongly associated with the Atkins Diet. However, there is an array of other diets that share to varying degrees the same principles (e.g. the Zone Diet, the Protein Power Lifeplan, and the South Beach Diet). Therefore, there is no widely accepted definition of what precisely constitutes a low-carbohydrate diet. It is important to note that the level of carbohydrate consumption defined as low-carbohydrate by medical researchers may be different than the level of carbohydrate defined by diet advisors. For the purposes of this discussion, we focus on diets that reduce (nutritive) carbohydrate intake sufficiently to dramatically reduce or eliminate insulin production in the body and to encourage ketosis (production of ketones to be used as energy in place of glucose).

 

Although originally low-carbohydrate diets were created based on anecdotal evidence of their effectiveness, today there is a much greater theoretical basis on which these diets rest. The key scientific principle which forms the basis for these diets is the relationship between consumption of carbohydrates and their effects on blood sugar (i.e. blood glucose) and hormone production. Blood sugar levels in the human body must be maintained in a fairly narrow range to maintain health. The two primary hormones related to regulating blood sugar levels, produced in the pancreas, are insulin, which lowers blood sugar levels, and glucagon, which raises blood sugar levels. In general, most western diets (and many others) are sufficiently high in nutritive carbohydrates that virtually every meal causes substantial insulin production and avoids ketosis, thus causing excess energy in the diet to be stored as fat (discussed in the next section). By contrast, low-carbohydrate diets, or more properly, diets that are very low in nutritive carbohydrates, discourage insulin production and tend to cause ketosis. Some researchers suggest that this causes excess dietary energy and body fat to be eliminated from the body. However, a review study of the scientific data published in the Lancet concluded that in the case of Atkins that there was no proof that the diet was effective beyond six months, and that it was unlikely that weight loss came through ketosis because ‘urinary traces of ketones were so low that very little energy would be used up this way’. Other studies have shown that small amounts of weight loss (approx. 1lb every 1 or 2 months) are achievable with such diets.

 

Low-carbohydrate diet advocates in general recommend reducing nutritive carbohydrates (commonly referred to as “net carbs,” i.e. grams of total carbohydrates reduced by the non-nutritive carbohydrates) to very low levels. This means sharply reducing consumption of desserts, breads, pastas, potatoes, rice, and other sweet or starchy foods. Some recommend levels as low as 20-30 grams of “net carbs” per day, at least in the early stages of dieting (for comparison, a single slice of white bread typically contains 15 grams of carbohydrate, almost entirely starch). By contrast, more standard nutrition guides typically recommend consumption levels in the neighborhood of 225-325 grams of carbohydrate per day (based on a 2000 calorie a day diet). Low-carbohydrate diets often differ in the specific amount of carbohydrates allowed, whether certain types of foods are preferred, whether occasional exceptions are allowed, etc. Generally they all agree that processed sugar should be eliminated, or at the very least greatly reduced, and similarly generally discourage heavily processed grains (white bread, etc.). They vary greatly in their recommendations as to the amount of fat allowed in the diet although the most popular versions today (including Atkins) generally recommend at most a moderate fat intake.

 

As a related note, there is a set of diets known as low-glycemic-index diets (low-GI diets) or low-glycemic-load diets (low-GL diets), in particular the Low GI Diet by Brand-Miller et al. In reality, low-carbohydrate diets are, literally speaking, low-GL diets (and vice versa) in that they specifically limit what contributes to the glycemic load in foods. In practice, though, “low-GI”/”low-GL” diets differ from “low-carb” diets in the following ways. First, low-carbohydrate diets treat all nutritive carbohydrates as having the same effect on metabolism and generally assume that their effect is independent of other nutrients in food. Low-GI/low-GL diets base their recommendations on the actual measured metabolic (glycemic) effects of the foods eaten. Second, as a practical matter, low-GI/low-GL diets generally do not recommend diets with glycemic loads low enough to minimize insulin production and induce ketosis, whereas low-carbohydrate diets generally do.

 

Another related diet type, the low-insulin-index diet, is very similar except that it is based on measurements of direct insulemic responses (i.e. the amount of insulin in the bloodstream) to food rather than glycemic response (the amount of glucose in the bloodstream). Although the diet recommendations mostly involve lowering nutritive carbohydrates, there are some low-carbohydrate foods that are discouraged as well (e.g. beef).

 

In contrast to these diets, based on evidence for risk of heart disease and obesity, the Institute of Medicine recommends that American and Canadian adults get between 40-65% of dietary energy from carbohydrates. The Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization jointly recommend that national dietary guidelines set a goal of 55-75% of total energy from carbohydrates, but only 10% should be from Free sugars (their definition of simple carbohydrates).

 

The Arizona Diet Products Program

A portion controlled, nutritionally balanced weight loss program that allows your body to rapidly lose weight, by burning fat for energy. Men’s and Women’s programs are nutritionally balanced and formulated with proven combinations of calories, carbohydrates, and protein, ensuring that you’ll achieve fast weight loss, while still maintaining your lean muscle. To learn more about this diet program Click Here.