Health and Essential Fatty Acids

Essential Fatty Acids, or EFAs, are fatty acids that cannot be constructed within an organism from other components (generally all references are to humans) by any known chemical pathways; and therefore must be obtained from the diet. The term refers to those involved in biological processes, and not fatty acids which may just play a role as fuel. As many of the compounds created from essential fatty acids can be taken directly in the diet, it is possible that the amounts required in the diet (if any) are overestimated. It is also possible they can be underestimated as organisms can still survive in less than ideal, malnourished conditions.

There are two families of EFAs: ω-3 (or omega-3 or n-3) and ω-6 (omega-6, n-6.) Fats from each of these families are essential, as the body can convert one omega-3 to another omega-3, for example, but cannot create an omega-3 from scratch. They were originally designated as Vitamin F when they were discovered as essential nutrients in 1923. In 1930, work by Burr, Burr and Miller showed that they are better classified with the fats than with the vitamins.

Functions

In the body, essential fatty acids serve multiple functions. In each of these, the balance between dietary ω-3 and ω-6 strongly affects function.

  • They are modified to make
    • the classic eicosanoids (affecting inflammation and many other cellular functions)
    • the endocannabinoids (affecting mood, behavior and inflammation)
    • the lipoxins from ω-6 EFAs and resolvins from ω-3 (in the presence of aspirin, down regulating inflammation.)
    • the isofurans, neurofurans, isoprostanes, hepoxilins, epoxyeicosatrienoin acids (EETs) and Neuroprotectin D
  • They form lipid rafts (affecting cellular signaling)
  • They act on DNA (activating or inhibiting transcription factors such as NFκB, which is linked to pro-inflammatory cytokine production)

 Nomenclature and terminology

Fatty acids are straight chain hydrocarbons possessing a carboxyl (COOH) group at one end. The carbon next to the carboxylate is known as α, the next carbon β, and so forth. Since biological fatty acids can be of different lengths, the last position is labeled ω, the last letter in the Greek alphabet. Since the physiological properties of unsaturated fatty acids largely depend on the position of the first unsaturation relative to the end position and not the carboxylate, the position is signified by (ω minus n). For example, the term ω-3 signifies that the first double bond exists as the third carbon-carbon bond from the terminal CH3 end (ω) of the carbon chain. The number of carbons and the number of double bonds is also listed. ω-3 18:4 (stearidonic acid) or 18:4 ω-3 or 18:4 n-3 indicates an 18-carbon chain with 4 double bonds, and with the first double bond in the third position from the CH3 end. Double bonds are cis and separated by a single methylene (CH2) group unless otherwise noted. So in free fatty acid form, the chemical structure of stearidonic acid is:

 

 The essential fatty acids start with the short chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (SC-PUFA):

  • ω-3 fatty acids:
    • α-Linolenic acid or ALA (18:3)
  • ω-6 fatty acids:
    • Linoleic acid or LA (18:2)

These two fatty acids cannot be synthesized by humans, as humans lack the desaturase enzymes required for their production.

They form the starting point for the creation of longer and more desaturated fatty acids, which are also referred to as long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA):

  • ω-3 fatty acids:
    • eicosapentaenoic acid or EPA (20:5)
    • docosahexaenoic acid or DHA (22:6)
  • ω-6 fatty acids:
    • gamma-linolenic acid or GLA (18:3)
    • dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid or DGLA (20:3)
    • arachidonic acid or AA (20:4)

ω-9 fatty acids are not essential in humans, because humans generally possess all the enzymes required for their synthesis. Exceptions do occur in older people or people with a liver problem that do not completely produce a sufficient amount, and hence many supplement companies market Omega 3-6-9 blends.

 Essentiality

Between 1930 and 1950, arachidonic acid and linolenic acid were termed ‘essential’ because each was more or less able to meet the growth requirements of rats given fat-free diets. Further research has shown that human metabolism requires both ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids. To some extent, any ω-3 and any ω-6 can relieve the worst symptoms of fatty acid deficiency. Particular fatty acids are still needed at critical life stages (e.g. lactation) and in some disease states. In nonscientific writing, common usage is that the term essential fatty acid comprises all the ω-3 or -6 fatty acids. Authoritative sources include the whole families, without qualification. The human body can make some long-chain PUFA (arachidonic acid, EPA and DHA) from lineolate or lineolinate.

Traditionally speaking the LC-PUFA are not essential. See (Cunnane 2003) for a discussion of the current status of the term ‘essential’. Because the LC-PUFA are sometimes required, they may be considered “conditionally essential”, or not essential to healthy adults.

Mary G. Enig has pointed out numerous studies showing the need for omega-3 and omega-6 essential fatty acids in mammalians A 2005 study has shown evidence that gamma-linolenic acid, GLA, a product of omega-6, has been shown to inhibit the breast cancer promoting gene of Her2/neu.

Biologist Ray Peat has pointed out flaws in the studies purportedly showing the need for n-3 and n-6 fats. He notes that so-called EFA deficiencies have sometimes been reversed by adding B vitamins or a fat-free liver extract to the diet. In his view, ‘the optional dietary level of the “essential fatty acids” might be close to zero, if other dietary factors were also optimized.’

Essential fatty acids should not be confused with essential oils, which are “essential” in the sense of being a concentrated essence.

 Food sources

Almost all the polyunsaturated fat in the human diet is from EFA. Some of the food sources of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids are fish and shellfish, flaxseed (linseed), hemp oil, soy oil, canola (rapeseed) oil, chia seeds, pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds, leafy vegetables, and walnuts.

Essential fatty acids play a part in many metabolic processes, and there is evidence to suggest that low levels of essential fatty acids, or the wrong balance of types among the essential fatty acids, may be a factor in a number of illnesses, including osteoporosis.

Plant sources of ω-3 contain neither eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) nor docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The human body can (and in case of a purely vegetarian diet often must, unless certain algae or supplements derived from them are consumed) convert α-linolenic acid (ALA) to EPA and subsequently DHA. This however requires more metabolic work, which is thought to be the reason that the absorption of essential fatty acids is much greater from animal rather than plant sources (see Fish and plants as a source of Omega-3 for more).

The IUPAC Lipid Handbook  provides a very large and detailed listing of fat contents of animal and vegetable fats, including ω-3 and -6 oils. The National Institutes of Health’s EFA Education group publishes ‘Essential Fats in Food Oils.’ This lists 40 common oils, more tightly focused on EFAs and sorted by n-6:3 ratio. Stuchlik and Zak, ‘Vegetable Lipids as Components of Functional Food  list notable vegetable sources of EFAs as well as commentary and an overview of the biosynthetic pathways involved. Users can interactively search at Nutrition Data for the richest food sources of particular EFAs or other nutrients. Careful readers will note that these sources are not in excellent agreement. EFA content of vegetable sources varies with cultivation conditions. Animal sources vary widely, both with the animal’s feed and that the EFA makeup varies markedly with fats from different body parts.

 Human health

Almost all the polyunsaturated fats in the human diet are EFAs. Essential fatty acids play an important role in the life and death of cardiac cells.

 

Weight Loss and Thyroid Function

What is the relationship between thyroid and weight?

It has been appreciated for a very long time that there is a complex

relationship between thyroid disease, body weight and metabolism.

Thyroid hormone regulates metabolism in both animals and humans.

Metabolism is determined by measuring the amount of oxygen used

by the body over a specific amount of time. If the measurement is made

at rest, it is known as the basal metabolic rate (BMR). Indeed,

measurement of the BMR was one of the earliest tests used to assess a

patient’s thyroid status. Patients whose thyroid glands were not working

were found to have low BMRs, and those with overactive thyroid glands

had high BMRs. Later studies linked these observations with

measurements of thyroid hormone levels and showed that low thyroid

hormone levels were associated with low BMRs and high thyroid

hormone levels were associated with BMRs. Most physicians no longer

use BMR due to the complexity in doing the test and because the BMR

is subject to many other influences other than the thyroid state.

What is the relationship between BMR and weight?

Differences in BMRs are associated with changes in energy balance.

Energy balance reflects the difference between the amount of calories

one eats and the amount of calories the body uses. If a high BMR is

induced by the administration of drugs, such as amphetamines, animals

often have a negative energy balance which leads to weight loss. Based

on such studies many people have concluded that changes in thyroid

hormone levels, which lead to changes in BMR, should also cause

changes in energy balance and similar changes in body weight.

However, BMRs are not the whole story relating weight and thyroid. For

example, when metabolic rates are reduced in animals by various

means (for example by decreasing the body temperature), these

animals often do not show the expected excess weight gain. Thus, the

relationship between metabolic rates, energy balance, and weight

changes is very complex. There are many other hormones (besides

thyroid hormone), proteins, and other chemicals that are very important

for controlling energy expenditure, food intake, and body weight.

Because all these substances interact on both the brain centers that

regulate energy expenditure and tissues throughout the body that

control energy expenditure and energy intake, we cannot predict the

effect of altering only one of these factors (such as thyroid hormone)

on body weight as a whole. As a consequence, at this time, we are unable

to predict the effect of changing thyroid state on any individual’s body

weight.

Hyperthyroidism and Weight Loss

What is the relationship between hyperthyroidism and weight?

Since the BMR in patients with hyperthyroidism is elevated, many                                                               patients with an overactive thyroid do,

indeed, experience some weight loss. Furthermore, the likelihood of

weight loss occurring is related to the severity of the overactive thyroid.

Thus, if the thyroid is extremely overactive, the individual’s BMR

increases which leads to increased caloric requirements to maintain

that weight. If the person does not increase the calories consumed to

match the excess calories burned, then weight loss will ensue. As

indicated earlier, the factors that control our appetite, metabolism, and

activity are very complex and thyroid hormone is only one factor in

this complex system. Nevertheless, on average the more severe the

hyperthyroidism, the greater the weight loss observed. Weight loss is

also observed in other conditions where thyroid hormones are elevated,

                                                                                                                                                                       such as in the toxic phase of thyroiditis  and

if one is on too high a dose of thyroid hormone pills. Since

hyperthyroidism also increases appetite, some patients may not lose

weight, and some may actually gain weight, depending on how much

they increase their caloric intake.

Why do I gain weight when hyperthyroidism is treated?

Because the hyperthyroidism is an abnormal state, we can predict that

any weight loss caused by the abnormal state would not be maintained

when the abnormal state is reversed. This is indeed what we find. On

the average, any weight lost during the hyperthyroid state is regained

when the hyperthyroidism is treated. One consequence of this

observation is that the use of thyroid hormone to treat obesity is not

very useful. Once thyroid hormone treatment is stopped, any weight that

is lost while on treatment will be regained after treatment is

discontinued.

Hypothryroidism and Weight Loss

What is the relationship between hypothyroidism and weight gain?

 

Since the BMR (basic metabolic rate) in the patient with hypothyroidism is decreased,                                       an under active thyroid is generally associated

with some weight gain. The weight gain is often greater in those

individuals with more severe hypothyroidism. However, the decrease

in BMR due to hypothyroidism is usually much less dramatic than the

marked increase seen in hyperthyroidism, leading to more modest

alterations in weight due to the under active thyroid. The cause of the

weight gain in hypothyroid individuals is also complex, and not always

related to excess fat accumulation. Most of the extra weight gained in

hypothyroid individuals is due to excess accumulation of salt and water.

Massive weight gain is rarely associated with hypothyroidism. In general,

5-10 pounds of body weight may be attributable to the thyroid,

depending on the severity of the hypothyroidism. Finally, if weight gain

is the only symptom of hypothyroidism that is present, it is less likely

that the weight gain is solely due to the thyroid.

 

How much weight can I expect to lose once the hypothyroidism is

treated?

 

Since much of the weight gain in hypothyroidism is accumulation in

salt and water, when the hypothyroidism is treated one can expect a

small (usually less than 10% of body weight) weight loss. As in the

treatment with hyperthyroidism, treatment of the abnormal state of

hypothyroidism with thyroid hormone should result in a return of body

weight to what it was before the hypothyroidism developed. However,

since hypothyroidism usually develops over a long period of time, it

fairly common to find that there is no significant weight loss after

successful treatment of hypothyroidism. Again, if all of the other

symptoms of hypothyroidism, with the exception of weight gain, are

resolved with treatment with thyroid hormone, it is less likely that the

weight gain is solely due to the thyroid. Once hypothyroidism has been

treated and thyroid hormone levels have returned to the normal range

on thyroid hormone, the ability to gain or lose weight is the same as in

individuals who do not have thyroid problems.

 

Can thyroid hormone be used to help me lose weight?

 

Thyroid hormones have been used as a weight loss tool in the past. Many

studies have shown that excess thyroid hormone treatment can help

produce more weight loss than can be achieved by dieting alone.

However, once the excess thyroid hormone is stopped, the excess weight

loss is usually regained. Furthermore, there may be significant negative

consequences from the use of thyroid hormone to help with weight

loss, such as the loss of muscle protein in addition to any loss of body

fat. Pushing the thyroid hormone dose to cause thyroid hormone levels

to be elevated is unlikely to significantly change weight and may result

in other metabolic problems.

Weight Loss and Meal Replacements

Improved Weight Loss and Long Term Health Benefits 

 

 The Arizona Diet Products program is based upon the use of convenient meal replacement shakes, bars, and puddings that are scientifically proven to provide superior short term and long-term weight loss. The convenient meal replacements make it easy to eat right and make the right choice consistently to ensure optimal success. Additionally the use of convenient meals, such as those provided by Arizona Diet Products, are associated with lower risk of certain types of disease markers. Together this means that the Arizona Diet Products program is an effective way to lose weight quickly and keep it off forever, along with increasing overall health in the long term. 

 

 Third Party Study: Value of structured meals for weight management: risk factors and long-term weight maintenance. 

 

 OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in biomarkers of disease risk after 51 months of reduced energy intake and sustained weight loss. 

 

 DESIGN: This study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, two-arm, parallel intervention for 12 weeks followed by a prospective, single-arm, 4-year trial in a university-based hospital clinic. One hundred patients were randomly assigned to one of two dietary interventions for 3 months. Group A was prescribed an energy-restricted diet of 1200 to 1500 kcal/d, and group B was prescribed an isocaloric diet, whereby two of three meals were replaced with nutrient-fortified liquid meal replacements (such as Arizona Diet Products). After 3 months, the patients were prescribed the same caloric reduction and used once-daily replacements for the succeeding 4 years. Body weight and blood pressure were checked monthly. Biomarkers of disease risk were measured after 3, 9, 15, 27, and 51 months. 

 

 RESULTS: During the 3-month weight-loss period, body weight was reduced by 1.5 +/- 0.4% and 7.8 +/- 0.5% (mean +/- SEM) for groups A and B, respectively. After 4 years, 75% of the patients were evaluated. Total mean weight loss was 3.3 +/- 0.8% and 8.4 +/- 0.8% for groups A and B, respectively. Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in glucose, insulin, triacylglycerol, and systolic blood pressure. Cholesterol concentrations were reduced in patients with high initial cholesterol levels and maintenance of a 7% weight loss. 

 

 DISCUSSION: Providing a structured meal plan with liquid meal replacements is an effective treatment for obese subjects. Long-term maintenance of weight loss with meal replacements improves biomarkers of disease risk. 

 

 Obesity Research Nov; 9 Supplement 4:284S-289S. 

Weight Loss Categories

Weight loss, in the context of medicine or health or physical fitness, is a reduction of the total body weight, due to a mean loss of fluid, body fat or adipose tissue and/or lean mass, namely bones mineral deposits, muscle, tendon and other connective tissue.

 

Unintentional weight loss

A significant loss of total body weight is a serious, chronic illness. Substantial, unintentional weight loss is a symptom of acute or chronic illness, especially if other evidence is present.

Weight loss, for example, accompanied by early satiety, bilious vomiting of partially undigested food, postprandial epigastric pain and eructation may indicate Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome. Weight loss accompanied by insatiable thirst and hunger and fatigue may indicate diabetes mellitus, a chronic disease characterized by an abnormal accumulation of carbohydrates in the bloodstream due to insufficient production of insulin, a hormone produced in the pancreas that, when secreted into the bloodstream, permits cellular metabolism and utilization of glucose.

Poor management of type 1 diabetes mellitus, also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), leads to an excessive amount of glucose and an insufficient amount of insulin in the bloodstream. This triggers the release of triglycerides from adipose (fat) tissue and catabolism (breakdown) of amino acids in muscle tissue. This results in a loss of both fat and lean mass, leading to a significant reduction in total body weight. Note that untreated type 1 diabetes mellitus will usually not produce weight loss, as these patients get acutely ill before they would have had time to lose weight.

Myriad of additional scientific considerations are applicable to weight loss, including but not limited to: physiological and exercise sciences, nutrition science, behavioral sciences, and other sciences.

One area involves the science of bioenergetics including biochemical and physiological energy production and utilization systems, that are frequently evidence of diabetes, and ketone bodies, acetone particles occurring in body fluids and tissues involved in acidosis, also known as ketosis, somewhat common in severe diabetes.

In addition to weight loss due to a reduction in fat and lean mass, illnesses such as diabetes, certain medications, lack of fluid intake and other factors can trigger fluid loss. And fluid loss in addition to a reduction in fat and lean mass exacerbates the risk for cachexia.

Infections such as HIV may alter metabolism, leading to weight loss.

Hormonal disruptions, such as an overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism), may also exhibit as weight loss. Intentional weight loss

Weight loss may refer to the loss of total body mass in an effort to improve fitness, health, and/or appearance.

Therapeutic weight loss, in individuals who are overweight, can decrease the likelihood of developing diseases such as diabetes. Overweight and obese individuals face a greater risk of health conditions such as type 2 diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure, stroke, osteoarthritis and certain types of cancer. For healthy weight loss, a physician should be consulted to develop a weight loss plan that is tailored to the individual.

Weight loss occurs when an individual is in a state of negative energy balance. When the human body is spending more energy in work and heat than it is gaining from food or other nutritional supplements, it will catabolize stored reserves of fat or muscle.

Although weight loss may involve loss of fat, muscle or fluid, weight loss for the purposes of maintaining health should aim to lose fat while conserving muscle and fluid.

It is not uncommon for people who are already at a medically healthy weight to intentionally lose weight. In some cases it is with the goal of improving athletic performance or to meet weight classifications in a sport. In other cases, the goal is to attain a more attractively shaped body. Being underweight is associated with health risks. Health problems can include difficulty fighting off infection, osteoporosis, decreased muscle strength, trouble regulating body temperature and even increased risk of death.

 Therapeutic weight loss techniques

 

The least intrusive weight loss methods and those most often recommended by physicians, are adjustments to eating patterns and increased physical exercise. Usually, health professionals will recommend that their overweight patients combine a reduction of the caloric content of the diet with an increase in physical activity. In addition, a much proposed method to hold oneself to a decreased calorie-diet is to increase the amount of water you drink. This method has been proposed by nutritionists as BCM and other organizations involved in weight loss.

Other methods of losing weight include use of drugs and supplements that decrease appetite, block fat absorption, or reduce stomach volume. Surgery is another method. Bariatric surgery artificially reduces the size of the stomach, limiting the intake of food energy. Some of these treatments may have serious side-effects.

 

 “Crash Dieting”

A crash diet is where a person willfully restricts themselves of all nourishment (except water) for more than 12 hours. The desired result is to have the body burn fat for energy with the goal of losing a significant amount of weight in a short time. Crash dieting is not the same as flexible intermittent fasting, where dieters fast for 2 days each week and calories are cycled. Generally the weight lost in a crash diet returns when normal eating resumes.

 Weight loss industry

In the developed world, there is a substantial market for products which promise to make weight loss easier, quicker, cheaper, more reliable, or less painful. These include books, CDs, crèmes, lotions, pills, rings and earrings, body wraps, body belts and other materials, fitness centers, personal coaches, weight loss groups and food products and supplements. US residents in 1992 spent an estimated $30 billion a year on all types of diet programs and products, including diet foods and drinks.

Between $33 billion and $55 billion is spent annually on weight loss products and services, including medical procedures and pharmaceuticals, with weight loss centers garnering between six percent and 12 percent of total annual expenditure. About 70 percent of American’s dieting attempts are of a self-help nature. Although often short-lived, these diet fads are a positive trend for this sector as Americans ultimately turn to professionals to help them meet their weight loss goals.

 

Increased Weight Loss with Controlled Portions

Increased Weight Loss Results Compared to Conventional Diets 

 

 Arizona Diet Products suwr is based upon the use of great tasting and convenient meal replacements. Meal replacements are scientifically shown to increase weight loss results when compared to conventional diets. This is because meal replacements are convenient, take all the guesswork out of eating correctly, and make consistency in eating the right amounts easier day in and day out. With Arizona Diet Products  you have advanced nutritional products that make following the program easy. 

 

 Third Party Study: Weight Management Using Meal Replacements 

 

 OBJECTIVE: Although used by millions of overweight and obese consumers, there has not been a systematic assessment on the safety and effectiveness of a meal replacement strategy for weight management. The aim of this study was to review, by use of a meta- and pooling analysis, the existing literature on the safety and effectiveness of a meal replacement plan using one or two vitamin/mineral fortified meal replacements as well as regular foods for long-term weight management. 

 

 DESIGN: A plan was defined as a program that prescribes a low calorie diet whereby meals are replaced by commercially available, energy-reduced product(s) that are vitamin and mineral fortified, and includes at least one meal of regular foods. Randomized, controlled interventions of at least 3 months duration, with subjects 18 y of age or older and a BMI-Z 25 kg/m2, were evaluated. Studies with self-reported weight and height were excluded. Searches in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Clinical Trials identified 30 potential studies for analysis. Of these, six met all of the inclusion criteria and used liquid meal replacement products (such as Arizona Diet Products shakes) with the associated plan. Overweight and obese subjects were randomized to the meal replacement plan or a conventional reduced calorie diet (RCD) plan. The prescribed calorie intake was the same for both groups. Authors of the six publications were contacted and asked to supply primary data for analysis. Primary data from the six studies were used for both meta- and pooling analyses. 

 

 RESULTS: Subjects prescribed either plans lost significant amounts of weight at both the 3-month and 1-year evaluation time points. All methods of analysis indicated a significantly greater weight loss in subjects receiving the meal replacement plan compared to the RCD group. Depending on the analysis and follow-up duration, the meal replacement group lost 7–8% body weight and the RCD group lost 3–7% body weight. Risk factors of disease associated with excess weight improved with weight loss in both groups at the two time points. The degree of improvement was also dependent on baseline risk factor levels. The dropout rate for meal replacement group and RCD groups was equivalent at 3 months and significantly less in the meal replacement group at 1 year. 

 

 CONCLUSION: This first systematic evaluation of randomized controlled trials utilizing meal replacement plans, such as Arizona Diet Products , for weight management suggests that these types of interventions can safely and effectively produce significant sustainable weight loss and improve weight-related risk factors of disease. 

 

 International Journal of Obesity 27, 537–549.

 

Benefits of Whey Protein in Dieting

Benefits of Whey Protein for Maintaining Lean Muscle Mass and Increased Metabolism 

 

 The Arizona Diet Products plan is a nutritionally complete weight loss program that contains a scientifically designed balance of protein, carbohydrates, and essential vitamins and minerals. Unlike fad diets that restrict a specific macronutrient, such as protein or carbohydrates, the Arizona Diet Products plan is nutritionally balanced — allowing for optimum weight loss results. One key component of the Arizona Diet products is the utilization of whey and casein protein. Since the amount of lean muscle a person has is the main determinant of their metabolic rate, utilizing whey and casein protein allows the body to maintain lean muscle, while still losing weight. As a result, as the body loses weight, it is able to maintain lean muscle mass, and also a higher metabolic rate throughout the diet. As a result of this, the body also maintains a higher metabolic rate after reaching its goal weight. 

 

 Third Party Study: Consumption of fluid skim milk promotes greater muscle protein accretion after resistance exercise than does consumption of an isonitrogenous and isoenergetic soy-protein beverage. 

 

 BACKGROUND: Resistance exercise leads to net muscle protein accretion through a synergistic interaction of exercise and feeding. Proteins from different sources may differ in their ability to support muscle protein accretion because of different patterns of postprandial hyperaminoacidemia. 

 

 OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of consuming isonitrogenous, isoenergetic, and macronutrient-matched soy or milk beverages (18 g protein, 750 kJ) on protein kinetics and net muscle protein balance after resistance exercise in healthy young men. Our hypothesis was that soy ingestion would result in larger but transient hyperaminoacidemia compared with milk and that milk would promote a greater net balance because of lower but prolonged hyperaminoacidemia. 

 

 DESIGN: Arterial-venous amino acid balance and muscle fractional synthesis rates were measured in young men who consumed fluid milk or a soy-protein beverage in a crossover design after a bout of resistance exercise. 

 

 RESULTS: Ingestion of both soy and milk resulted in a positive net protein balance. Analysis of area under the net balance curves indicated an overall greater net balance after milk ingestion (P < 0.05). The fractional synthesis rate in muscle was also greater after milk consumption (0.10 +/- 0.01%/h) than after soy consumption (0.07 +/- 0.01%/h; P = 0.05). 

 

 CONCLUSION: Milk-based proteins (such as New Lifestyle Diet products) promote muscle protein accretion to a greater extent than do soy-based proteins when consumed after resistance exercise. The consumption of either milk or soy protein with resistance training promotes muscle mass maintenance and gains, but chronic consumption of milk proteins after resistance exercise likely supports a more rapid lean mass accrual. 

 

 American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2007 Apr; 85(4):1031-40.

Atkins Diet, History and Overview

Nature of the diet

 

The Atkins Diet represents a departure from prevailing theories. Atkins claimed there are two main unrecognized factors about Western eating habits, arguing firstly that the main cause of obesity is eating refined carbohydrates, particularly sugar, flour, and high-fructose corn syrups; and secondly, that saturated fat is overrated as a nutritional problem, and that only trans fats from sources such as hydrogenated oils need to be avoided. Consequently, Dr. Atkins rejected the advice of the food pyramid, instead asserting that the tremendous increase in refined carbohydrates is responsible for the rise in metabolic disorders of the 20th century, and that the focus on the detrimental effects of dietary fat has actually contributed to the obesity problem by increasing the proportion of insulin-inducing foods in the diet. While most of the emphasis in Atkins is on the diet, nutritional supplements and exercise are considered equally important elements.

 

Atkins involves the restriction of carbohydrates in order to switch the body’s metabolism from burning glucose to burning stored body fat. This process (called lipolysis) begins when the body enters the state of ketosis as a consequence of running out of excess carbohydrates to burn. Dr. Atkins in his book New Diet Revolution claimed that the low-carbohydrate diet produces a “metabolic advantage” where the body burns more calories, overall, than on normal diets, and also expels some unused calories. He cited one study where he estimated this advantage to be 950 calories (4.0 MJ) a day. However, a review study in the Lancet (see below) concluded that there was no metabolic advantage and dieters were simply eating fewer calories due to boredom. Professor Astru stating that “The monotony and simplicity of the diet could inhibit appetite and food intake.”, or possibly protein inducing a satiating effect.

 

The Atkins diet restricts “net carbs” (carbohydrates that have an effect on blood sugar). The effect is to decrease the onset of hunger from low blood sugar. Dr. Atkins says in Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution (2002) that hunger is the number one reason why low-fat diets fail. Though studies show the efficacy of the Atkins approach after one year is the same as a low-fat diet, Dr. Atkins claimed that it was easier to stay on the Atkins diet because dieters did not feel hungry or “deprived”. Other studies have sited that the ‘low fat’ trend which portrays the myth that fat in the food somehow transfers to fat in the body, do not mention the essential amino-acids which are essential in brain function and precursors to serotonin and other neurotransmitters. One study goes as far as comparing the low fat trend with the increase in diagnosed depression over the last two decades.

 

Net carbohydrates can be calculated from a food source by subtracting sugar alcohols and fiber (which are shown to have a negligible effect on blood sugar levels) from total carbohydrates. Sugar alcohols need to be treated with caution, because while they may be slower to convert to glucose, they can be a significant source of glycemic load and can stall weight loss. Fructose (e.g., as found in many industrial sweeteners) also contributes to caloric intake, though outside of the glucose-insulin control loop.

 

 

Preferred foods in all categories are whole, unprocessed foods with a low glycemic load. Atkins Nutritionals, the company responsible for marketing the Atkins Diet, recommends that no more than 20% of calories eaten while on the diet come from saturated fat.

 

According to his book Atkins Diabetes Revolution, for people whose blood sugar is abnormally high or who have type-2 diabetes, this diet decreases or eliminates the need for drugs to treat these conditions. The Atkins Blood Sugar Control Program (ABSCP) is an individualized approach to weight control and permanent management of the risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

 

 Phases

 

There are four phases of the Atkins diet: induction, ongoing weight loss, pre-maintenance and lifetime maintenance.

 

 Induction

 

The Induction phase is the first, and most restrictive, phase of the Atkins Nutritional Approach. It is intended to cause the body to quickly enter a state of ketosis. Carbohydrate intake is limited to 20 net grams per day (grams of carbohydrates minus grams of fiber, sugar alcohols, or glycerin), 12 to 15 net grams of which must come in the form of salad greens and other green vegetables (broccoli, green beans, spinach and asparagus). The allowed foods include a liberal amount of all meats, fish, shellfish, fowl, and eggs; up to 4 ounces (113 g) of soft or semi-soft cheese; salad vegetables; other low carbohydrate vegetables; and butter and vegetable oils. Drinking eight glasses of water per day is a must during this phase. Alcoholic beverages are not allowed during this phase. Caffeine is allowed in moderation so long as it does not cause cravings or low blood sugar. If a caffeine addiction is evident, it is best to not allow it until later phases of the diet. A daily multivitamin with minerals is also recommended.

 

The Induction Phase is usually when many see the most significant weight loss — reports of losses of 5 to 10 pounds per week are not uncommon when Induction is combined with daily exercise.

 

Atkins suggests the use of Ketostix, small chemically reactive strips used by diabetics. These let the dieter monitor when they enter the ketosis or fat burning, phase. Other indicators of ketosis include a metallic taste in the mouth, or bad breath.

 

 Ongoing weight loss

 

The Ongoing Weight Loss (OWL) phase of Atkins consists of an increase in carbohydrate intake, but remaining at levels where weight loss occurs. The target daily carbohydrate intake increases each week by 5 net grams. A goal in OWL is to find the “Critical Carbohydrate Level for Losing” and to learn in a controlled manner how food groups in increasing glycemic levels and foods within that group affect your craving control. The OWL phase lasts until weight is within 10 pounds (4.5 kg) of the target weight. During the first week, one should add more of the induction acceptable vegetables to his/her daily products. For example, 6-8 stalks of asparagus, salad, and one cup of cauliflower or one half of avocado. The next week, one should follow the carbohydrate ladder that Dr Atkins created for this phase and add fresh dairy. The ladder has 9 rungs and should be added in order given. One can skip a rung if one does not intend to include that food group in one’s permanent way of eating, such as the alcohol rung.

 

The rungs are as follows:

 

    * Induction acceptable vegetables

    * Fresh dairy

    * Nuts

    * Berries

    * Alcohol

    * Legumes

    * Other fruits

    * Starchy vegetables

    * Grains

 

 Pre-maintenance

 

Carbohydrate intake is increased again this time by 10 net carbs a week from the ladder groupings, and the key goal in this phase is to find the “Critical Carbohydrate Level for Maintenance”, this is the maximum number of carbohydrates you can eat each day without gaining weight. This may well be above the level of carbohydrates inducing ketosis on a testing stick. As a result, it is not necessary to maintain a positive ketosis test long term.

 

 Lifetime maintenance

 

This phase is intended to carry on the habits acquired in the previous phases, and avoid the common end-of-diet mindset that can return people to their previous habits and previous weight. Whole, unprocessed food choices are emphasized, with the option to drop back to an earlier phase if you begin to gain weight.

 

 Popularity

 

The Atkins Nutritional Approach gained widespread popularity in 2003 and 2004. At the height of its popularity one in eleven North-American adults were on the diet. This large following was blamed for large declines in the sales of carbohydrate-heavy foods like pasta and rice (sales were down 8.2 and 4.6 percent, respectively, in 2003). The diet’s success was even blamed for a decline in Krispy Kreme sales. Trying to capitalize on the “low-carb craze,” many companies released special product lines that were low in carbohydrates. Coca-Cola released C2 and Pepsi-Cola created Pepsi Edge, which was scheduled to be discontinued later in 2005. Unlike the sugar-free soft drinks Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi, which had been available for decades, these new drinks used a blend of traditional sweetener and the diet drinks’ artificial sweeteners to offset the allegedly inferior artificial sweetener flavor. These “half-and-half” drinks declined in popularity as soft drink makers learned to use newer sweeteners to mask the flavor of aspartame (or completely replace it) in reformulated diet drinks such as Coca-Cola Zero and Pepsi ONE.

 

Robert Atkins died from a fatal head injury sustained in a fall on ice in 2003. The nutritional plan suffered from rumors and allegations that he was obese at the time and had died from a heart condition as a result. On July 31, 2005, the Atkins Nutritional company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection after the percentage of adults on the diet declined to two percent and sales of Atkins brand product fell steeply in the second half of 2004.

 

The Low Carb Revolution was a one-hour documentary television special on the Atkins diet. The special, which aired on Food Network Canada, on April 25, 2004, described how this diet works, had success stories, and quickly presented some recipes.

 

 Scientific Studies

 

Several randomized, controlled studies of less than one year, published in peer-reviewed journals, have been conducted to gauge the effectiveness of the Atkins diet. There are no rigorous studies to show the results after 1 year.

 

According to a review of the scientific data published in the Lancet, there is no proof that the Atkins diet is effective beyond 6 months. The review led by Arne Astrup of the Centre of Advanced Food Research at Copenhagen’s RVA University, concluded that “There is no clear evidence that Atkins-style diets are better than any others for helping people to stay slim,[and] despite the popularity and apparent success of the Atkins diet, evidence in support of its use lags behind. Although the diet appears as claimed to promote weight loss without hunger at least in the short-term, the long-term effects on health and disease prevention are unknown.”

 

The researchers concluded it was unlikely that weight-loss come through ketosis because ‘urinary traces of ketones were so low that very little energy would be used up this way’. They concluded that a possible reason that participants lost weight was that the diet was so monotonous that they simply ate less; weight loss was a result of boredom. “Patients who want to try these diets should be told that, although safety cannot be guaranteed, they seem to be safe for short-term use (up to six months) as long as weight loss occurs,” the authors said.

 

When the Atkins diet was introduced in the 1970s, it was immediately attacked by existing experts, who claimed it was unhealthy and would fail. For example, Atkins testified before the Senate Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs, in April, 1973. That day, “three authorities in nutrition and health … [testified] that Atkins’s severely carbohydrate-restricted diet was neither revolutionary, effective, nor safe,” and a comment by Harvard nutritionist Fred Stare was read into the record: “The Atkins diet is nonsense…. Any book that recommends unlimited amounts of meat, butter and eggs, as this does, in my opinion is dangerous. The author who makes the suggestion is guilty of malpractice.” Subsequent studies have not supported those fears for the short term, but the long term safety remains unknown.

 

    * “The low-carbohydrate diet produced a greater weight loss for the first six months, but the differences were not significant at one year. The low-carbohydrate diet was associated with a greater improvement in some risk factors for coronary heart disease. Adherence was poor and attrition was high in both groups. Longer and larger studies are required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and high-fat diets.” — New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 348, Pages 2082-2090, 22 May 2003, Number 21

    * A study comparing weight loss and metabolic changes in obese adults randomly assigned to either a low-carbohydrate diet or a conventional weight loss diet at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center concluded the following: “Participants on a low-carbohydrate diet had more favorable overall outcomes at 1 year than did those on a conventional diet. Weight loss was similar between groups, but effects on atherogenic dyslipidemia and glycemic control were still more favorable with a low-carbohydrate diet after adjustment for differences in weight loss.”

    * In a controlled study, published in JAMA (March 7, 2007), by Gardner at Stanford University, found ‘Weight loss was not statistically different among the Zone, LEARN, and Ornish groups’ but ‘was significantly different between the Atkins and Zone diets’. The study followed 311 premenopausal, nondiabetic women, age 25-50. The women lost more weight (mean 4.7 kg equating to 0.2lbs(90g)/week) on the Atkins diet than on 3 higher-carbohydrate diets (LEARN 2.6 kg, Ornish 2.2 kg, and Zone 1.6 kg), without increasing cardiovascular risks. The statistically significant findings for changes in HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and systolic blood pressure favored Atkins over the other three diets. The authors conclude: “Concerns about adverse metabolic effects of the Atkins diet were not substantiated within the 12-month study period.”

 

The strongest evidence is randomized, controlled studies published in peer-reviewed journals. The greater the number of subjects, and the longer the subjects are followed, the more powerful the study. To date, the longest studies are 1 year, so the effects of the diet over longer durations are not known.

 

The medical principles and scientific theory behind the Atkins diet were first put forward in a series of articles by Dr. Richard D. Feinman, a professor of biochemistry and medical researcher at State University of New York (SUNY) Health Science Center (Downstate) at Brooklyn. Feinman, president of the Nutrition & Metabolism Society, published work which attempts to prove the common idea that “a calorie is a calorie” is not correct. His research aims to demonstrate why the diet is nutritionally sound and to elucidate principles which prove Atkins scientifically correct.

 

Proponents of the Atkins diet feel much of the criticism leveled at the diet comes from statements and opinions of individuals and associations, rather than from controlled and reviewed studies. Advocates of the diet dispute criticisms, such as the fact that a low-carbohydrate diet is likely to be high-fat and allegations that fat, especially saturated fat, is harmful. Atkins backers maintain that, unlike trans fat, which can result from partial hydrogenation, fully saturated fat is not harmful. Proponents cite the award-winning science writer Gary Taubes who, in a 2001 article in Science, 291 (5513): 2536 claimed that the oft-cited “consensus” opinion against saturated fats derives from political rather than scientific motives. Taubes’ 2007 book Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease also makes this point, but in more depth. Taubes reviews the nutrition research of a century from various angles, and draws his conclusion from a very diverse set of evidence.

 

One study found that saturated fat may be cardio-protective in post menopausal women.

 

The May 22, 2003, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine published two scientific, randomized studies comparing standard low-fat diets to low-carbohydrate diets such as the Atkins Diet. In both studies, subjects lost more weight on the low-carbohydrate plans at 6-months but not at 1-year. The editors noted that “Adherence was poor and attrition was high in both groups. Longer and larger studies are required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of low-carbohydrate, high-protein, and high-fat diets.”

 

Duke University, funded by an unrestricted grant from the Atkins Foundation, (2005) found that both the low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets studied improved cardiac health indicators, but in different ways. The commonality between the diets studied is that both restricted refined sugar and junk food and both encouraged 30 minutes of exercise at least three times a week.

 

 Controversies

 

An analysis conducted by Forbes magazine found that the boxed retail Atkins Nutritional Approach food product is one of the top five in the expense category of ten plans Forbes analyzed. The analysis showed the median average of the ten diets was approximately 50% higher, and Atkins 80% higher, than the American national average. Atkins was less expensive than Jenny Craig and more expensive than Weight Watchers.

 

Low-carbohydrate diets have been the subject of heated debate in medical circles for three decades. They are still controversial and only recently has any serious research supported some aspects of Atkins’ claims, especially for short-term weight-loss (6 months or less).

 

But many in the scientific community also raise serious concerns:

 

    * Dr. Robert Eckel of the American Heart Association says that high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets put people at risk of heart disease; A long term study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2006 found that women reduced heart disease risk by eating more protein and fat from vegetable sources.

 

    * A 2001 scientific review conducted by Freedman et al. and published in the peer reviewed scientific journal Obesity Research concluded that low-carb dieters’ initial advantage in weight loss was a result of increased water loss, and that after the initial period, low-carbohydrate diets produce similar fat loss to other diets with similar caloric intake.

 

    * The May 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine study showed that “minor adverse effects” of diarrhea, general weakness, rashes and muscle cramps “were more frequent in the low-carbohydrate diet group”.

 

    * Consuming too much protein can create health problems and protein toxicity for patients with certain medical problems, for example those with preexisting kidney problems.

 

Opponents of the diet also point out that the initial weight loss upon starting the diet is a phenomenon common with most diets, and is due to reduction in stored glycogen and related water in muscles, not fat loss. They claim that no evidence has surfaced that any diet will cause weight loss unless it reduces food energy (calories) below the maintenance level and that weight loss from the Atkins diet may be the result of less food energy being consumed by the dieter, rather than the lack of carbohydrates. They further point out that weight loss on fad diets, which typically restrict or prohibit certain foods, is often because the dieter has fewer food choices available.

 

 Misconceptions about the diet

 

Many people incorrectly believe that the Atkins Diet promotes eating unlimited amounts of fatty meats and cheeses. This is a key point of clarification that Dr. Atkins addressed in the more recent revisions of his book. Although the Atkins Diet does not impose limits on certain foods, or caloric restriction in general, Dr. Atkins points out in his book that this plan is “not a license to gorge.” The director of research and education for Atkins Nutritionals, Collette Heimowitz, has said, “The media and opponents of Atkins often sensationalize and simplify the diet as the all-the-steak-you-can-eat diet. This has never been true.”

 

Another common misconception arises from confusion between the Induction Phase and rest of the diet. The first two weeks of the Atkins Diet are strict, with only 20g of carbohydrates permitted per day. Atkins states that a dieter can safely stay at the Induction Phase for several months if the person has a lot of weight to lose. Once the weight-loss goal is reached, carbohydrate levels are raised gradually, though still significantly below USDA norms, and still within or slightly above the definition of ketosis.

 

The Induction Phase is also known for its comparatively lower intake of dietary fiber, and this is often misconstrued as characteristic of the diet as a whole. In fact fiber supplements, such as psyllium seed husks, are recommended for the early stages. It is often misstated that those on the diet do not consume enough vegetables and fruits. However those who follow it properly should not face this problem as even the Induction Phase allows for adequate amounts of dark green leaf vegetables.

 

 

 

 

Diabetes, Exercise, and Weight Loss

Diabetes, Diet, and Exercise

 

 

Exercising as little as 30 minutes a day and eating a healthy diet can help delay or prevent the onset of Type 2 diabetes by more than 50 per cent for those at high risk for the disease, according to the results of a national prevention trial released at the beginning of August.

 

The results of the five-year study, funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), were deemed so convincing by the study’s external data monitoring board that they ended the clinical trial this spring, a year ahead of schedule. This information comes at a time when public health officials are calling diabetes and its health consequences an “epidemic.”

 

Sixteen million Americans already have diabetes, but more than 5 million of them are undiagnosed. Diabetes usually affects those over age 40 and is more likely to occur in those who are obese or in people with a family history of the disease.

 

“It couldn’t come at a better time,” said Health and Human Services secretary Tommy Thompson last month. “In the last 10 years, Type 2 diabetes has exploded. The population is aging; our most vulnerable ethnic populations are increasing as well. Americans weigh more than ever before and too many people live sedentary lives.”

 

Study Targeted High Risk Groups

The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) compared diet and exercise to treatment with the drug metformin (or Glucophage) in 3,234 people with impaired glucose tolerance, a condition that puts people at high risk for diabetes.

 

Study participants were randomly assigned to either a lifestyle intervention group, treatment with metformin, or to receive a placebo. Participants in all three of the study arms were advised about healthy eating and exercise.

 

Those assigned to the lifestyle group reduced their diabetes risk by 58 per cent. On average, that group maintained their physical activity at 30 minutes per day and lost 5-7 per cent of their body weight, or 10-15 pounds. This segment of the study was especially successful for older participants, aged 60 and older, who reduced their development of diabetes by 71 per cent through lifestyle changes.

 

The study called for participants to lower their fat intake to less than 25 per cent of their caloric intake. Participants in this segment of the study received six months of instruction in healthy eating, exercise and behavior and less frequent follow up sessions over the next few years.